WELCOME   HELP   HEADLINES   SEARCH-ARTICLES   COMMENTS   POST-ARTICLE   SETUP   PRIVATE-MAIL   SIGN-IN   REGISTER
 
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

EDITORIAL
See other EDITORIAL Articles

Title: Paul Craig Roberts: The Year America Dissolved
Source: infowars
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/the-year-america-dissolved/
Published: Jul 29, 2010
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2010-07-29 11:08:41 by Robin
Ping List: *Paul Craig Roberts*     Subscribe to *Paul Craig Roberts*
Keywords: None
Views: 234
Comments: 10

It was 2017. Clans were governing America.

The first clans organized around local police forces. The conservatives’ war on crime during the late 20th century and the Bush/Obama war on terror during the first decade of the 21st century had resulted in the police becoming militarized and unaccountable.

As society broke down, the police became warlords. The state police broke apart, and the officers were subsumed into the local forces of their communities. The newly formed tribes expanded to encompass the relatives and friends of the police.

The dollar had collapsed as world reserve currency in 2012 when the worsening economic depression made it clear to Washington’s creditors that the federal budget deficit was too large to be financed except by the printing of money.

With the dollar’s demise, import prices skyrocketed. As Americans were unable to afford foreign-made goods, the transnational corporations that were producing offshore for US markets were bankrupted, further eroding the government’s revenue base.

The government was forced to print money in order to pay its bills, causing domestic prices to rise rapidly. Faced with hyperinflation, Washington took recourse in terminating Social Security and Medicare and followed up by confiscating the remnants of private pensions. This provided a one-year respite, but with no more resources to confiscate, money creation and hyperinflation resumed.

Organized food deliveries broke down when the government fought hyperinflation with fixed prices and the mandate that all purchases and sales had to be in US paper currency. Unwilling to trade appreciating goods for depreciating paper, goods disappeared from stores.

Washington responded as Lenin had done during the “war communism” period of Soviet history. The government sent troops to confiscate goods for distribution in kind to the population. This was a temporary stop-gap until existing stocks were depleted, as future production was discouraged. Much of the confiscated stocks became the property of the troops who seized the goods.

Goods reappeared in markets under the protection of local warlords. Transactions were conducted in barter and in gold, silver, and copper coins.

Other clans organized around families and individuals who possessed stocks of food, bullion, guns and ammunition. Uneasy alliances formed to balance differences in clan strengths. Betrayals quickly made loyalty a necessary trait for survival.

Large scale food and other production broke down as local militias taxed distribution as goods moved across local territories. Washington seized domestic oil production and refineries, but much of the government’s gasoline was paid for safe passage across clan territories.

Most of the troops in Washington’s overseas bases were abandoned. As their resource stocks were drawn down, the abandoned soldiers were forced into alliances with those with whom they had been fighting.

Washington found it increasingly difficult to maintain itself. As it lost control over the country, Washington was less able to secure supplies from abroad as tribute from those Washington threatened with nuclear attack. Gradually other nuclear powers realized that the only target in America was Washington. The more astute saw the writing on the wall and slipped away from the former capital city.

When Rome began her empire, Rome’s currency consisted of gold and silver coinage. Rome was well organized with efficient institutions and the ability to supply troops in the field so that campaigns could continue indefinitely, a monopoly in the world of Rome’s time.

When hubris sent America in pursuit of overseas empire, the venture coincided with the offshoring of American manufacturing, industrial, and professional service jobs and the corresponding erosion of the government’s tax base, with the advent of massive budget and trade deficits, with the erosion of the fiat paper currency’s value, and with America’s dependence on foreign creditors and puppet rulers.

The Roman Empire lasted for centuries. The American one collapsed overnight.

Rome’s corruption became the strength of her enemies, and the Western Empire was overrun.

America’s collapse occurred when government ceased to represent the people and became the instrument of a private oligarchy. Decisions were made in behalf of short-term profits for the few at the expense of unmanageable liabilities for the many.

Overwhelmed by liabilities, the government collapsed.

Globalism had run its course. Life reformed on a local basis.

Paul Craig Roberts is an economist who served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration. He is published widely in the alternative media, including Infowars.com, and is a frequent guest on the Alex Jones Show.

Click for infowars Subscribe to *Paul Craig Roberts*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Robin (#0) (Edited)

I remember reading Andrei Amalrik's Will the Soviet Union Survive Until 1984? when I was stationed in Berlin in the early 1970's. I was bemused by Amalrik's thesis, but I didn't really believe the Soviet Union could end so soon. However, in the end, Amalrik ended up not being far wrong.

aristeides  posted on  2010-07-29   14:22:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: aristeides (#1)

5 out of 5 stars

Note that 1984 was an arbitrary date, chosen because of Orwell's book. Also, note that Almarik was killed in a supposed auto "accident" in Spain in the 1980's. Perhaps a KGB assasination? In any case, it is unfortunate that he did not live to see the breakup of the Soviet Union by 1990.

The reviews going back to 1999 at that amazon link are quite interesting.

Also this one:

I read this book as a college sophomore in 1977. Although it seemed incredible that the U.S.S.R. might be on the brink of collapse, by the time I was finished, Amalrik had me convinced.

The book is not an easy read, but it is a worthwhile one, even today. Amalrik cited three reasons why the U.S.S.R. was doomed (the fact that it was surrounded by enemies, its simmering ethnic rivalries, especially between "blue eyes" [Russians] and "brown eyes" [the Turkic peoples of the Southern Republics], and the failure to build a society based on law). In the wake of the disintegration of the Soviet Union and its aftermath, his analysis has been proven to be dead on.

In particular, while I couldn't see it at the time, I now understand why crime became such a massive problem in the wake of the Soviet Union's fall. As Amalrik speaks of the dissolution of ethics, especially among the young, one can't help but think of Russia's new thuggish "elite". The book provides an excellent insight into where they came from, and why.

Of course, books that are classics have another aspect to them: they not only elucidate, but also influence. This book circulated in samizdat (Russ, "mimeo") for a couple of years before reaching the West; the publisher believed that over 50,000 copies were smuggled around the Soviet Union.

Thus, the irony of the title: 1984 was the year that the old guard passed from the scene, and Gorbachev's clique began its rise to power. Looking at Gorbachev's program ("glasnost", "perestroika", and the "New Thinking" in foreign policy, couple with his willingness to cut loose the Eastern European satellites and the Balts), one has to wonder: did the Gorbachevs read this book, and were the policies they enacted a last-ditch effort to stave off the inevitable?

I would not at all be surprised to learn that this was indeed the case.

"The trade of the petty usurer is hated with most reason: it makes a profit from currency itself, instead of making it from the process which currency was meant to serve. Their common characteristic is obviously their sordid avarice." ~Aristotle

Robin  posted on  2010-07-29   15:13:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: aristeides (#1)

I found von Kuehnelt-Leddihn's Leftism to be an invaluable antidote to history and polisci as taught at schools and universities.

Polybius, and was it Plato, had a theory about cycles of government, the anakyklosis, according to which democracies with broad suffrage must end badly. (The gap between the brightest and the average voter is such that the brightest can exploit the average voter at will, and demagogues make politics with an eye towards the long-term wellbeing highly unlikely.)

Buchanan, who has proven prescient on some points has touched this, as has Paul C Roberts, and Hoppe, with his Democracy, the God That Failed.

The New Englanders who shaped the fate of the states post-1865 hailed from a European tradition that tacitly, but quite emphatically, did not believe in broadbased democracies, but rather in democracies for wealthy bourgeouis cities as a counterbalance to Europe's aristocratic autocracies.

max  posted on  2010-07-29   15:22:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: max (#3)

That was Polybius's theory. As a Greek aristocrat, and one who had suffered ill treatment by Greek democrats, he was not sympathetic to true democracy.

He was, on the other hand, very favorably disposed to the Roman Republic. He was a friend of the leading Roman politician Scipio Aemilianus. He thought a mixed constitution of the sort he thought he saw in Rome could avoid degeneration through the cycles.

History didn't bear out his view of the Roman Republic, which started to degenerate very soon after Polybius died, and was dead a century after that.

The Athenian democracy established by the reforms of Cleisthenes at the end of the 6th century B.C., on the other hand, lived on for over 400 years (except for some brief oligarchic interludes), until Sulla finally abolished it in 86 B.C.

Now that the Founding Fathers' idea of checks and balances has failed, because all branches of our government are made up of elected politicians and/or their appointees, who have too many interests in common that they do not share with average Americans, so that they feel they have a greater interest in working together against average Americans, rather than checking and balancing each other, I would like to see checks and balances restored by introducing an element of real democracy in our system that would make our constitution a truly mixed one. My pet idea is to choose the members of the lower houses of our legislatures by lot, like for juries, as Athens did for most of its officials. Those legislative houses would then not be made up of politicians, they would have a veto power over anything the politicians and their appointees proposed to do, and, by the laws of statistics, they would proportionately represent every segment of our population. Average citizens in these houses would check and balance the nondemocratic parts of our governments, and the elected politicians and appointees in those nondemocratic parts could check and balance the average citizens in the lower houses.

aristeides  posted on  2010-07-29   19:14:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: aristeides (#4) (Edited)

. My pet idea is to choose the members of the lower houses of our legislatures by lot, like for juries, as Athens did for most of its officials. Those legislative houses would then not be made up of politicians, they would have a veto power over anything the politicians and their appointees proposed to do, and, by the laws of statistics, they would proportionately represent every segment of our population. Average citizens in these houses would check and balance the nondemocratic parts of our governments, and the elected politicians and appointees in those nondemocratic parts could check and balance the average citizens in the lower houses.

Taki has recently just said as much.

http://www.takimag.com/index.php/blogs/article/its_all_greek_to_me

I, personally, think that between the quiet demise of the WASP elite in the NE that used to run the country and the abolition of literacy tests and property requirements before people could vote in the South, the country has gotten itself into a lot of trouble. I think that you could argue that between the WASP elite and mayor Daley in Chicago, the US was once quite close to a mixed regime, albeit one dressed up as a republic.

I wish to be emphatically clear that the less intellectually priviliged must be treated with respect, charity, and justice, but I wonder if it might not be humane to give them, say money to buy reasonably good healthcare or some other emoluments, and in return expect them to not vote.

At the very latest, by the time people vote for a presidential candidate based on the likelihood that he'll bringing a nuclear war about (the rapture), it should be clear that something is so seriously wrong that it must be changed. Is it humane to let people who can't recognize a demagogue vote for a demagogue of their choosing?

max  posted on  2010-07-29   20:13:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: max, aristeides (#5) (Edited)

. My pet idea is to choose the members of the lower houses of our legislatures by lot, like for juries, as Athens did for most of its officials. Those legislative houses would then not be made up of politicians, they would have a veto power over anything the politicians and their appointees proposed to do, and, by the laws of statistics, they would proportionately represent every segment of our population. Average citizens in these houses would check and balance the nondemocratic parts of our governments, and the elected politicians and appointees in those nondemocratic parts could check and balance the average citizens in the lower houses.

Choosing by lot worked in Athens because those chosen were not part timers - the men chosen by lot spent their whole lives (probably as kids next to their fathers) in the Boule.

If I can offer my 2 cents to a solution to the current American governance problem,,,,,. One solution may be to eliminate the fiction of State sovereignties and eliminate the Senate and create a unicameralist one chamber parliament that would grant powers to more than two parties (force coalitions, etc). Make the president the head of state and have a prime minister for head of govt.

But that goes against the grain of the small govt states rights crowd (and constitution I might add) which is the current front runner for "saving the republic" though in all honesty these small govt state sovereigns ignore the fact that that system failed the republic in 1861 (if it worked the southern states wanting to leave and the northern states forcing them not to would not have been needed).

I say the notion of 50 sovereign states is now a fiction because now people come and go across state lines as if they were not even there. Many people were not born in their states and if they do commute one or more states over daily for work. So If I was from New Jersey but now live in CT but commute to New York for work what role does the theory of state sovereignties mean in my life and the lives of millions like me? Nothing. It in facts creates problems because it up ends tax burdens. My birth state (the state I should be loyal to) is deprived of my income. New York, which provides my income sees some benefit from my working there but I don't live there and don't vote and CT gets benefits from my New York employment but gets to tax my income the state did not help me much to generate.

I know it is a heresy to openly proclaim that state sovereignties in this day and age is anachronistic and creates more problems than it solves but someone has to say it.

Destro  posted on  2010-07-30   12:54:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Robin (#2)

No mention of economics as the reason for collapse? Just ethnocentric ones? None of the 3 reasons cited by Amalrik caused the collapse of the USSR.

Destro  posted on  2010-07-30   13:06:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Destro (#7)

I haven't read Andrei Amalrik's  Will the Soviet Union Survive Until 1984? , so I cannot comment; but those two reviews I posted seemed to have found his work somewhat prophetic.

"The trade of the petty usurer is hated with most reason: it makes a profit from currency itself, instead of making it from the process which currency was meant to serve. Their common characteristic is obviously their sordid avarice." ~Aristotle

Robin  posted on  2010-07-30   13:13:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Destro (#6)

I say the notion of 50 sovereign states is now a fiction because now people come and go across state lines as if they were not even there.

You can argue for a redrawing of state lines, (I think upstate NY state would be much better off as a separate state) but to abolish them would be a disaster.

"They" drove a stake through states' rights because, they claimed, it was "awful" that some states were fairly backwards. This was a disaster because having states that are an embarassment is the price you have to pay to have states that are the pride of the world, as NY, and New England were in the 1950s.

States can work around the imbalances you describe by taxing things that hit commuters hard, such as commercial real estate, parking lots and mass transit and the like at high rates. Don't forget that commuters make jobs for locals.

max  posted on  2010-07-30   14:31:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: max (#9)

States can work around the imbalances

You remind me of Romans from 200 AD wishing to return to the republic of old from 300 years past.

Many are stuck in the ideology that claims that the "state sovereign" vs the Fed is the model they operate under. I am stating that for democracy to remain and for the Military Industrial Complex dictatorship to be averted - maybe the best hope is to create a unicameralist one chamber parliament that would grant powers to more than two parties (we may see coalition govts where Kucinick or Ron Paul types now can help form policy). Make the president the head of state and have a prime minister for head of govt.

I understand the wish to return to the old republic but the old republic is dead and we can not return to an older model in this day and age.

Destro  posted on  2010-07-31   12:05:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


Status: Not Logged In;
Sign In

 

 

LATEST NEWS!

How did unemployment grow to such devastating levels?

Long Island Man Arrested For Defending Home With AK-47 From MS-13 Gang (Video)

Whistleblower Claims Many U.S. Interpreters Can't Speak Afghan Languages

PRNewswire-USNewswire: 1,270 Architects/Engineers Reveal Hard Evidence of Explosive Demolition at World Trade Center on 9/11

LCOL Lakin - Ruling on the Motions by Judge Lind

Glenn Beck joins U.S. officials, religious leaders in condemning Koran burning

Declassified: Massive Israeli manipulation of US media exposed

Savage says "Jews like" Jon Stewart "cause antisemitism," adds that Stewart has a "drug-addled mind"

Income Growth Rates 1948 - 2005

Austerity for Workers, Welfare for Banks --- European Banks Still on the Brink


CURRENT  ARTICLES

28 Years After the Massacre at Sabra-Shatila Munir's Story

Federal court: 4th Amendment standard does not always apply to mobile phone location data

Former CIA officer accused of abusing suspect now training other operatives

5 arrested in Spain for male prostitution ring

Devils and the Deep Blue Sea

Human Rights Watch - Soros

Mont. tea party removes leader after anti-gay post

The Story of Obama: All in the Company

Furor Over N.Y. Islamic Center Renews Debate Over Federal Government Spying on Muslims

Fourmile Fire could take several days to contain: 3,500 acres burning, 3,000 residents evacuated

Lasting Pleasures, Robbed by Drug Abuse

Planned Quran-burning could endanger troops, Petraeus warns

Obama slams DC special interests: ‘They talk about me like a dog’

Bipolar disorder 'not to blame for violent behaviour'
"It is probably more dangerous walking outside a pub on a late night than walking outside a hospital where patients have been released”

Rare color footage of London blitz found on eve of 70th

Happy Rosh Hashanah: Israel's population reaches 7.6 million

KRUGMAN: 1938 in 2010

Graham Repeats Lie That Estate Tax is Going to Devastate Small Businesses and Family Farms

How Corporations Destroyed American Democracy - Chris Hedges (Video)

"You Lie!" Joe Wilson, GOP Congressman, Faces Wider Ethics Probe Than Previously Disclosed

Labor Day Special: Since When Did Outsourcing Become Funny?

Margaret and Helen: 100 Grand Bore

Proposition 23 draws fire for controversial ties to oil and Tea Party ( Local Tea Partier: The Founders Believed Whatever My Corporate Overlords Say They Believed!)

President Obama to Announce Plan to Renew and Expand America’s Roads, Railways and Runways

Finally, People Are Calling For A REAL Housing-Market Fix: Letting Prices Fall

Department Of Labor Launches New Website To Help Unemployed Americans

Manual on How to Molest Children Is Legal, Cops Say - Florida Police Still Want to Know Who Is Responsible fof 170-page Book

Grim Housing Choice: Help Today’s Owners or Future Ones. [Let the Market Crash]

Washington Times struggles amid divisions of [Sun Myung Moon] family, ideology, finances

Madrid 'cautious' as Eta declares another ceasefire

New Zealand earthquake rips a new fault line across the world... moving one side of the earth 11ft to the right

UK: Student immigration levels unsustainable, says minister

Astronauts say world should prepare for asteroid threats

Vatican: stoning in Iran adultery case 'brutal'

Greece grapples with illegal immigrants

COLLAPSE OF AMERICAN LIBERALISM (Video)

Nose-Diving Hawk Halts Mail Delivery In Calgary Neighborhood (Video)

Sound of Music | Central Station Antwerp (Belgium)

TPF Weekly Blog - Week of September 5 to September 11, 2010

Abbas: No talks Without Settlement Building Freeze

The Latest Scheme In California: Dissolving Cities

LOLGOP - the UN-Drudge Report

Amazing WWII Story (Video)

The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond

Researchers develop tea bag filter that cleans water

Ripping Off Dead War Vets' Beneficiaries -- Prudential and many insurers ripping off families of killed war vets

The GOP's Oompa-Loompa

7 Spending Tips From Frugal Billionaires

CIA's 'Red Cell' Hypocrisy on Terror

Bring Our War $$ Home speech at VFP convention, Portland, Maine

'Stalin liked Hitler and his way with opponents'

9/11 Truth is Still the Issue

Selling With Torture

Modern slavers begging for mercy in Hawaii

DEMOCRATS PLAN POLITICAL TRIAGE TO RETAIN HOUSE

Blair: Cheney Wanted War With Syria

U.S. Quran Burning Sparks Indonesia Protests Outside American Embassy

Florida’s High-Speed Answer to a Foreclosure Mess

Luis Urzua, the foreman keeping hope alive for Chile's trapped miners

Pentagon declined to investigate hundreds of purchases of child pornography


WELCOME   HELP   HEADLINES   SEARCH-ARTICLES   COMMENTS   POST-ARTICLE   SETUP   PRIVATE-MAIL   SIGN-IN   REGISTER

  Please report web page problems, questions or comments to owner2@the-peoples-forum.com  Site Meter